Zika, of which the existence has been known for decades, would thus become the perfect cover to avoid facing the very expensive responsibilities derived from the damages caused by the monstrous consumption of highly toxic pesticides in Brazil.
In his third article on Zika, Rappoport focuses his attention on one of the potential causes of the numerous cases of children born with brain damage and microcephaly in Brazil.
And it turns out that another of the potential causes of these damages are the genetically modified mosquitoes that were already released in Brazil in 2012, with the aim of decimating the population of mosquitoes that transmit dengue, Zika, yellow fever and chikungunya.
The same genetically modified mosquitoes with which they now tell us they want to "fix the problem."
As they tell us in RT: "From the first moment concerns arose about the release of these genetically modified mosquitoes without having carried out more studies on possible side effects."
"It is a very experimental approach that has not yet been successful and may cause more harm than good," Dr. Helen Wallace, director of the GeneWatch institute, warned in 2012 in statements to 'The Guardian'.
The first cases of Zika in humans were documented in Brazil last May, estimating that 1.5 million people are currently infected.
Critics of the Oxitec company, producer of these genetically modified mosquitoes, recall that the area in which the OX513A transgenic Mosquitoes were released is the same where the spread of the virus began.
And it is in fact, the same area of Brazil (Juazeiro), where the majority of birth defects are now reported.
Since the start of the outbreak, more than 4,000 cases of babies born with microcephaly have been registered in Brazil since last October.
All of this should be considered a crucial clue for scientists and should have been the first thing the media indicated, rather than contributing to paranoia towards a virus, Zika, for which there is no scientific proof that it causes microcephaly.
But let's talk for a moment about the Oxitec company, which released those transgenic mosquitoes.
To begin with, it should be noted that Oxitec has help from Bill Gates to carry out its experiments, something that for people duly informed about the true eugenicist intentions of Bill Gates, is a very bad sign.
Oxitec is owned by Intrexon, which is owned by billionaire Randal J Kirk.
Intrexon is developing technology that uses synthetic biology, or biological engineering, to make "breakthroughs" in multiple fields, from pharmaceuticals to genetically modified plants and animals. The company has development agreements with AquaBounty, which in turn produces genetically modified salmon.
Let us remember that the main controversy surrounding the production of genetically modified plants and animals is that there is no rigorous independent study that guarantees that they are safe for consumption and that they will not have negative effects on the environment.
As Jon Rappoport points out, Intrexon has the famous Dr. Sam Broder as Vice President of the Health Sector.
For six years, Broder was the Director of the US National Cancer Institute where he was a key player in the push for the AIDS drug, AZT. This drug, which had initially failed chemotherapy treatments, was taken again and underwent a scandal-riddled clinical trial, which led to its approval by the FDA (US Food and Drug Administration).
According to Rappoport, AZT is extremely toxic. It prevents human cells from replicating and suppresses the immune system, that is, the very system that AIDS is supposed to be attacking.
On November 28, 2011, Intrexon welcomed two new executives to the company's board of directors: Robert B. Shapiro and Jeffrey B. Kindler.
Shapiro was the former CEO of Monsanto and NutraSweet (maker of the controversial aspartame, a highly toxic sweetener found in many sodas).
For his part, Kindler was the former CEO of the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and executive vice president and general counsel of McDonald’s.
That is, people "of all confidence in the field of public health", related to nothing more and nothing less than:
- With the commercialization of Monsanto's carcinogenic herbicide Roundup
- Toxic Aspartame, which causes obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cancer
- The anti-inflammatory Bextra (valdecoxib), linked to severe allergic reactions and heart attacks in patients and which caused Pfizer to pay a fine of 2.3 billion dollars for criminal conduct when commercializing it ...
And of course:
- McDonald’s junk food, which has caused so much damage to the health of several generations.
These people, with "such an outstanding resume", were in charge of running the Oxitec company when genetically modified mosquitoes were released to fight Dengue ... no comment.
In an article published in the Activist Post, Claire Bernish reveals a little-known connection between mosquitoes and antibiotics used in the livestock industry.
Recall that the scientific hypothesis that justifies the use of genetically modified mosquitoes establishes that the transgenic male mosquito will inseminate natural females, but no real generation of mosquitoes will proliferate beyond the larval stage, due to the modified genes.
But according to Claire Bernish in her article: “According to an unclassified document from the Brazilian Trade and Agriculture Directorate Commission dated February 2015, Brazil is the third largest consumer of tetracycline, an antibiotic that is supplied to animals through food.
As a study by the American Society of Agronomy explains: "It is estimated that approximately 75% of antibiotics are not absorbed by animals and are excreted in waste"
One of the antibiotics specifically named in that report for its persistence in the environment is precisely tetracycline, which can be found in soils, surface waters, and some foods.
And what is the final effect?
A confidential internal document of the Oxitec company itself disclosed in 2012 makes it clear to us: Oxitec recognizes that up to 15% of the larvae could survive.
To what conclusion does all this lead?
Well, we have genetically modified mosquitoes released into the environment, which are supposed to extinguish themselves, but in reality, and due to the contamination of food and water caused by the antibiotic tetracycillin, they could survive in their larval stage, causing the birth of generations of mosquitoes descended from normal mosquitoes and genetically modified mosquitoes.
Mosquitoes, which by the way, are vectors not only of Dengue, but also of Zika.
Has anyone studied what effects the bite of one of those newly created hybrid mosquitoes can have on human health?
The answer is clear and forceful: A NOT BROKEN.
Well, if we take into account that the epidemic of microcephaly cases occurs precisely in the same area of Brazil where these mosquitoes were released, we find a possible cause-effect relationship that no one seems willing to take into account.
Could it be the genetically modified mosquitoes themselves released by Oxitec with the support of the Brazilian authorities, the cause of these terrible effects and the outbreak of Zika cases itself?
Is the Zika virus itself being used as a cover to hide the true causes of the epidemic of microcephaly cases among newborns?
What is clear is that there is NOT a single scientific evidence linking the Zika virus with the 4,000 cases of Microcephaly that have appeared in Brazil since October. Not even one.
Nor is there anything that justifies that after 60 years of knowledge of the existence of the Zika virus, such an epidemic outbreak suddenly occurs and effects hitherto unknown and never previously reported appear.
The only difference between now and decades ago is the evident temporal and physical coincidence between the appearance of these cases of microcephaly and the record consumption of highly toxic pesticides in Brazil of the latter, the application of the Tdap vaccine in pregnant women in Brazil ( initiated in 2014 against the warnings of the manufacturers themselves) and the release of genetically modified mosquitoes from the Oxitec company and the more than likely creation of hybrid mosquitoes whose effect on the environment and human health is absolutely unknown.
Why do the media continue to obediently repeat the absurd official version of the WHO that is not based on any scientific evidence and avoid talking about these obvious signs?
Where are the journalists, those people who spend 4 years studying in a college and who are supposed to communicate the truth about the facts to the population?
How is it possible that none of them see the elephant in the room?
What is clear is that if the epidemic of microcephaly cases were shown to be due to pesticides, vaccines or genetically modified mosquitoes, large companies would face multimillion-dollar compensation and fines.
However, if a virus is blamed (which had been there for a long time and which nobody paid attention to for having a minor incidence), large companies can continue with their business and even expand it, providing alleged solutions to the epidemic, in the form of vaccines and the release of more genetically modified mosquitoes, always with the support of that mafia entity at the service of the great economic powers called OMS.
And it is not just a matter of business and earning indecent amounts of money.
We are also facing a great maneuver of large-scale social manipulation.
The foundations of the world of the future are being laid, a technocratic dictatorship in which we will all be subject to the designs of the new priests, who will no longer wear robes, but white robes and whom we must blindly obey for being the bearers of the "truth absolute most indisputable ”.
They will be the most visible face of power and authority in the new regime and will dictate the future of populations and individuals.
These neo-priests will take multiple forms: they will be doctors, physicists, chemists, biologists or economists.
When they decree "epidemic" everyone should be vaccinated, when they decree that something is "disease" everyone should take medicine against it, when they decree "crisis" everyone should tighten their belts and stop consuming or increase the consumption, as appropriate.
Now they are getting us used to obeying them, year after year, through a thousand and one campaigns of unfounded terror that present them as the only saving line that separates us from disaster or even the apocalypse.
Has anyone noticed that for a few years now, each season a new fashionable disease appears with the capacity to become a “global epidemic”?
Bird flu, SARS, influenza A, swine flu, MERS, Superbugs, Ebola and now Zika ...
Not only is the Zika virus being used as more than a possible cover to hide unwanted effects caused by large companies (if it has not been caused voluntarily), but it is also part of a long-term agenda.
Is anyone willing to see the elephant in the room?
The Robot Fisherman